Madrasah Leadership in the Post COVID-19 Era: Lesson Learn From Crisis in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.eduline1037Keywords:
madrasah leadership, post Covid-19, crisisAbstract
This study wants to highlight how madrasah leadership is conceptualized and how madrasah leadership shifts after Covid-19. The pandemic crisis that occurred in Indonesia put pressure on so broad, including madrasah education. The challenges of madrasah leadership have entered a new phase after the Covid-19 outbreak began to subside, schools began to open together with other tasks that became the concern of madrasah leaders. This study uses a literature study approach, the data is obtained through the theoretical literature related to the topic of this research, the data is then analyzed descriptively. The results of this study indicate that the concept of madrasah leadership after Covid-19 experienced a drastic shift to a dynamic direction after facing various changing challenges. In addition, in the development of the shift in madrasah leadership after the Covid-19 period, it is necessary to consider further the following three styles of madrasah leadership being developed, namely: collaborative leadership, flexible-adaptive, and social justice.
Abstrak
Studi ini ingin menyoroti bagaimana kepemimpinan madrasah dikonseptualisasikan dan untuk bagaimana pergeseran kepemimpinan madrasah setelah Covid-19. Krisis pandemi yang terjadi di Indonesia memberikan tekanan yang begitu luas termasuk pendidikan madrasah. Tantangan kepemimpinan madrasah telah memasuki babak baru setelah wabah Covid-19 mulai mereda, sekolah mulai dibuka berbarengan dengan tugas lainnya yang menjadi perhatian pimpinan madrasah. Studi ini menggunakan pendekatan studi literatur, data diperoleh melalui literatur teoritis yang berkaitan dengan topik penelitian ini, data selanjutnya dilakukan analisis secara diskriptif. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa konsepsi kepemimpinan madrasah setelah Covid-19 mengalami pergeseran yang drastis ke arah dinamis setelah menghadapi berbagai tantangan yang berubah-ubah. Di samping itu pula, dalam perkembangannya pergeseran kepemimpinan madrasah setelah masa Covid-19 perlu mempertimbangkan lebih lanjut tiga corak kepemimpinan madrasah yang dikembangkan berikut, yaitu: kepemimpinan kolaboratif, fleksibel-adaptif, dan berkeadilan sosial.
References
Bagwell, J. (2020). Leading Through a Pandemic: Adaptive Leadership and Purposeful Action. Journal of School Administration Research and Development. https://doi.org/10.32674/jsard.v5is1.2781
Berkovich, I. (2016). School leaders and transformational leadership theory: time to part ways? Journal of Educational Administration. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-11-2015-0100
Bogotch, I. E. (2002). Educational Leadership and Social Justice: Practice into Theory. Journal of School Leadership. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268460201200203
Bush, T., & Glover, D. (2014). School leadership models: What do we know? School Leadership and Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2014.928680
Coelli, M., & Green, D. A. (2012). Leadership effects: School principals and student outcomes. Economics of Education Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.09.001
DeMatthews, D. E. (2014). How to Improve Curriculum Leadership: Integrating Leadership Theory and Management Strategies. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2014.911141
Dunn, R. (2020). Adaptive leadership: Leading through complexity. International Studies in Educational Administration.
Gruenert, S. (2005). Correlations of Collaborative School Cultures with Student Achievement. NASSP Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1177/019263650508964504
Hallinger, P. (2005). Instructional Leadership and the School Principal: A Passing Fancy that Refuses to Fade Away. Leadership and Policy in Schools. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760500244793
Harris, A. (2020). COVID-19 – school leadership in crisis? Journal of Professional Capital and Community. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-06-2020-0045
Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2020). COVID 19–school leadership in disruptive times. School Leadership and Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2020.1811479
Huber, S. G., & Helm, C. (2020). COVID-19 and schooling: evaluation, assessment and accountability in times of crises—reacting quickly to explore key issues for policy, practice and research with the school barometer. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-020-09322-y
Kolodziejczyk, J. (2015). Leadership and Management in the Definitions of School Heads. ATHENS JOURNAL OF EDUCATION. https://doi.org/10.30958/aje.2-2-3
Lamm, K., Carter, H., & Lamm, A. (2016). A Theory Based Model of Interpersonal Leadership: An Integration of the Literature. The Journal of Leadership Education. https://doi.org/10.12806/v15/i4/t2
Moos, L., & Huber, S. (2007). School Leadership, School Effectiveness and School Improvement: Democratic and Integrative Leadership. In International Handbook of School Effectiveness and Improvement. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5747-2_32
Onorato, M. (2013). Transformational leadership style in the educational sector: An empirical study of corporate managers and educational leaders. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal.
Starr, J. P. (2020). On Leadership: Responding to COVID-19: Short- and long-term challenges. Phi Delta Kappan. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721720923796
Thoonen, E. E. J., Sleegers, P. J. C., Oort, F. J., & Peetsma, T. T. D. (2012). Building school-wide capacity for improvement: the role of leadership, school organizational conditions, and teacher factors. School Effectiveness and School Improvement. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2012.678867
Wang, J., Choi, D., & Tran Natalie, A. (2021). Introduction: Strengthening School Leadership for the Era of Post COVID-19. Journal of School Leadership. https://doi.org/10.1177/10526846211041499
Zuber-Skerritt, O. (2011). Action Leadership: Towards a Participatory Paradigm. Springer.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
