Articles | 2024-02-29

ESG Performance on Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivity: Case Study of Non-Financial Companies Listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange

Novi Anri, Cynthia Afriani Utama
Quantitative Economics and Management Studies, Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024), pp. 135-141 https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.qems2323 Published: 2024-02-29
Get Permissions

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the influence of ESG performance on Investment - Cash Flow Sensitivity of non-financial companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the 2017-2022 period. ESG performance was measured using ESG ratings from Sustainalytics' ESG Research and Ratings, obtained from the Bloomberg Terminal database. Testing process was carried out on 50 registered non-financial companies in Indonesia for six years with a total of 300 observations obtained through purposive sampling techniques. The results of research employed panel balance data and the OLS method found that there are still phenomena Investment – Cash Flow Sensitivity occurred and good ESG performance could reduce Investment – Cash Flow Sensitivity. Thus, it can be indicated that companies implementing good ESG performance can more easily obtain funding sources.

Keywords

References (22)

  1. Aǧca, Ş., & Mozumdar, A. (2008). The impact of capital market imperfections on investment-cash flow sensitivity. Journal of Banking and Finance, 32 (2), 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2007.02.013
  2. Almeida, H., and Campello, M. (2007). Financing Constraints, Asset Tainability, and Corporate Investment. 1429–1460.
  3. Berardi, M. (2011). Credit Rationing in Markets With Imperfect Information. SSRN Electronic Journal . https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1010965
  4. Chen, H., & Chen, S. (2012). Investment-cash flow sensitivity cannot be a good measure of financial constraints: Evidence from the time series. Journal of Financial Economics, 103 (2), 393–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.08.009
  5. Eccles, R.G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science , 60 (11), 2835–2857. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984
  6. Fazzari, SM, Hubbard, RG, Petersen, BC, Blinder, AS, & Poterba, J.M. (1988). Financing Constraints and Corporate Investment. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity , 1988 (1), 141. https://doi.org/10.2307/2534426
  7. Flammer, C. (2015). Does corporate social responsibility lead to superior financial performance? A regression discontinuity approach. Management Science , 61 (11), 2549–2568. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2038
  8. Hadlock, C. J. (1998). Ownership, Liquidity, and Investment. The RAND Journal of Economics, 29 (3), 487. https://doi.org/10.2307/2556101
  9. Jensen, M. C. (2009). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. Corporate Bankruptcy , 11–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511609435.005
  10. Kaplan, S. N., & Zingales, L. (2000). Investment-cash flow sensitivities are not valid measures of financing constraints. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115 (2), 707–712. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355300554782

How to Cite

Anri, N., & Utama, C. A. (2024). ESG Performance on Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivity: Case Study of Non-Financial Companies Listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange. Quantitative Economics and Management Studies, 5(1), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.qems2323