The Influence Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Political Connections on Tax Aggressivity through Institutional Ownership As A Moderation Variable

Erianto Paembonan; Erwin Saraswati; Syaiful  Iqbal

doi:10.35877/454RI.qems2237

Erianto Paembonan Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia (ID)
Erwin Saraswati Universitas Brawijaya (ID)
Syaiful Iqbal Universitas Brawijaya (ID)

https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.qems2237

Keywords: Corporate Social Responsibility, Political Connections, Tax Aggressivity

Viewed = 0 time(s)

Abstract

The aim of this research is to determine the influence between corporate social responsibility and political connections on tax aggressiveness through institutional ownership as a moderating variable. This type of research is quantitative research, involving all companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange in the 2017-2021 year of observation as the population. The data sources used in this research are secondary data obtained from company websites and the Indonesian Stock Exchange website (www.idx.co.id). The quantity of CSR as measured by calculating how much information related to corporate social responsibility has a negative influence on the presence of tax aggressiveness within the company. CSR quality has a negative influence on tax aggressiveness, which means that CSR quality can pressure companies to be tax aggressive. The existence of political connections that a company has no effect on the tax aggressiveness carried out by the company. Institutional ownership can moderate the quantity of CSR on tax aggressiveness. Institutional ownership moderates the relationship between CSR quality and tax aggressiveness. In the analysis results, it is proven that institutional ownership strengthens the negative influence of CSR quality on tax aggressiveness. Has been proposed that institutional ownership can moderate the influence of political connections on tax aggressiveness.

Author Biographies

Erwin Saraswati, Universitas Brawijaya

Universitas Brawijaya

Syaiful Iqbal, Universitas Brawijaya

Universitas Brawijaya

References

. Y. (2018). Infrastruktur Dan Kebijakan Fiskal Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.24912/je.v17i2.410
Armstrong, C. S., Glaeser, S., & Kepler, J. D. (2019). Strategic reactions in corporate tax planning. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 68(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2019.03.003
Bose, S., Khan, H. Z., & Monem, R. M. (2021). Does green banking performance pay off? Evidence from a unique regulatory setting in Bangladesh. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 29(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12349
Chen, S., Liu, X., & Lu, C. (2022). Fiscal Decentralization, Local Government Behavior, and Macroeconomic Effects of Environmental Policy. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/su141711069
Dewi, S., Nataherwin, & Widyasari. (2020). Pengaruh Insentif Pajak, Tarif Pajak, Sanksi Pajak Dan. Jurnal Ekonomika Dan Manajemen, 9(2), 108–124.
Dyreng, S. D., Hanlon, M., & Maydew, E. L. (2010). The effects of executives on corporate tax avoidance. Accounting Review, 85(4). https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2010.85.4.1163
El-Chaarani, H., & Lombardi, R. (2022). The impact of corporate governance and political connections on the financial performance: the analysis of the financial distress of Lebanese banks. International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences, 15(4), 510–538. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJADS.2022.123865
Fatmayani, N., & Panjawa, J. L. (2021). Pengaruh Aspek Moneter Dan Fiskal Terhadap Inflasi Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, 10(2), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.23960/jep.v10i2.215
Fauziah & Widiyati. (2022). The Effect Of Tax Incentives And Good Corporate Governance On Tax Avoidance. Journal Of Industrial Engineering & Management Research, 3(1).
Gusti, D. P., Supriyono, B., Wardhono, H., Rozikin, M., & Riyadi, B. S. (2021). Public policy: Inconsistency of online and conventional land transportation regulations in Indonesia on social conflict implications. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 10. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.87
Heitzman, S. M., & Ogneva, M. (2019). Industry tax planning and stock returns. Accounting Review, 94(5). https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-52361
Maghfirani, H. N., Hanum, N., & Amani, R. D. (2022). Analisis Tantangan Penerapan Pajak Karbon Di Indonesia. Juremi: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, 1(4).
Marditasari, M., & Sari, S. P. (2021). Determinan yang Mempengaruhi Tax Saving pada Klasifikasi Industri Consumer Goods di Indonesia. Perspektif Akuntansi, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.24246/persi.v4i1.p75-88
Nayenggita, G. B., Raharjo, S. T., & Resnawaty, R. (2019). PRAKTIK CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (CSR) DI INDONESIA. Focus : Jurnal Pekerjaan Sosial, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.24198/focus.v2i1.23119
Pancarani, N., Athori, A., & Kusumaningarti, M. (2023). Pengaruh Tax Avoidance Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan Dengan Kepemilikan Institusional Sebagai Variabel Moderasi. JURNAL AKUNTANSI DAN MANAJEMEN MUTIARA MADANI, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.59330/ojsmadani.v11i1.143
Pradhan, S. K., Nayak, P. K., & Armitage, D. (2022). A social-ecological systems perspective on dried fish value chains. Current Research in Environmental Sustainability, 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsust.2022.100128
Ramadhani, F. N., & Ningsih, S. S. (2022). Pengaruh Return On Asset, Debt To Equity Ratio dan Deferred Tax Expense Terhadap tax Avoidance. JMB : Jurnal Manajemen Dan Bisnis, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.31000/jmb.v11i1.5171
Ridwan, R., & Dyah Pekerti, R. (2022). Pengaruh Good Corporate Governance Terhadap Tax Avoidance. JURNAL EKONOMI PERJUANGAN, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.36423/jumper.v4i1.961
Rohyati, Y., & Suripto, S. (2021). Corporate Social Responsibility, Good Corporate Governance, and Management Compensation against Tax Avoidance. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v4i2.1968
S.Siregar, B. W., Yulianto, K. I., Freddy, J., & Rini, P. (2023). The Effect Of Local Taxes On Regional Original Income . Jurnal Ekonomi, 12(1).
Setyawan, S. (2021). Pengaruh Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Dan Good Corporate Governance (GCG) Terhadap Tax Avoidance. Jurnal Akademi Akuntansi, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.22219/jaa.v4i2.17992
Shevlin, T., Urcan, O., & Vasvari, F. P. (2020). Corporate tax avoidance and debt costs. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 42(2). https://doi.org/10.2308/atax-52605
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D (1st ed.). Penerbit Alfabeta.
Susilawati, N., Bramasta, R. E., Murwendah, & Saragih, A. H. (2022). Evaluating Indonesia’s Presumptive Tax Policy on Accountant Professional Services. Information Management and Business Review, 13(4(I)). https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v13i4(i).3268
Thompson, D. F. (2018). Theories of Institutional Corruption. In Annual Review of Political Science (Vol. 21). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-120117-110316
Velez, G. M., & Gerstein, L. H. (2021). Supporting peaceful individuals, groups, and societies: Peace psychology and peace education. Peace and Conflict, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000541
Vito, B., Firmansyah, A., Qadri, R. A., Dinarjito, A., Arfiansyah, Z., Irawan, F., & Wijaya, S. (2022). MANAGERIAL ABILITIES, FINANCIAL REPORTING QUALITY, TAX AGGRESSIVENESS: DOES CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY DISCLOSURE MATTER IN AN EMERGING MARKET? Corporate Governance and Organizational Behavior Review, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.22495/cgobrv6i1p2
Zafar, M. B., & Sulaiman, A. A. (2021). CSR narrative under Islamic banking paradigm. In Social Responsibility Journal (Vol. 17, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-09-2018-0230