Evaluation of the Budget Allocation Policy on Improving the Quality of High School and Vocational High School Education in Kutai Kartanegara Regency

Heriman Heriman; Widyatmike Gede  Mulawarman; Warman Warman

doi:10.35877/454RI.eduline1167

Authors

Heriman Universitas Mulawarman, Kota Samarinda, Kalimantan Timur, 75119, Indonesia
Widyatmike Gede Mulawarman Universitas Mulawarman, Kota Samarinda, Kalimantan Timur, 75119, Indonesia
Warman Universitas Mulawarman, Kota Samarinda, Kalimantan Timur, 75119, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.eduline1167

Keywords:

Performance Evaluation, Policy, Budget Allocation, Quality of Education

Abstract

This study aims to describe the implementation and evaluation of budget allocation policies for high school and vocational education in Kutai Kartanegara Regency and what obstacles are faced by the government in the education budget allocation policy. This study uses a qualitative approach with the policy evaluation method Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP) model. Data collection in the study involved ten participants consisting of the Head of the Education and Culture Office of East Kalimantan, Member of Commission IV of the DPRD of East Kalimantan Province. Principal of SMAN 1 Tenggarong, Principal of SMAN 2 Tenggarong, Principal of SMAN 3 Kota Bangun, Principal of SMAN 2 Tenggarong Seberang, Principal of SMAN 1 Muara Badak, Principal of SMKN 3 Tenggarong, Principal of SMKN 1 Tenggarong Seberang, and Principal of SMKN 2 Sebulu. Data collection methods are observation, interviews, and documentation. The process of data analysis was carried out through the stages of reduction, presentation, and conclusion drawing as well as analysis of the evaluation of the CIPP model. The results of this study indicate that: (1) The implementation of the education budget allocation policy in Kutai Kartanegara Regency is carried out by the East Kalimantan Provincial Government through the Department of Education and Culture by allocating a budget for the education sector of Rp 2.1 trillion. The budget is used by the Department of Education and culture with 2 expenditure compositions, namely direct expenditure, and indirect expenditure; (2) Based on the evaluation, decisions can be formulated into 4, namely: decisions on planning, decisions on procedures, decisions on implementation and decisions on follow-up; (3) The obstacle faced is the limited number of activity items, especially the existence of policies that regulate budget proposals for schools which must be based on the number of students. This causes delays and delays in the construction and development of schools that have a shortage of students.

References

Amon, L., Cahaya, W., & Tresia, Y. (2021). Implementasi Performance-Based Budgeting pada Institusi Pendidikan Tinggi di Indonesia: Kajian Literatur. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kewirausahaan, 9(1), 118–131. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47668/pkwu.v9i1.172

Azainil, A., Apriliani, N. U., & Suandie, S. (2018). Policy Evaluation Total Quality Management (TQM) School Applying International Organization for Standardization (ISO) in the City of Samarinda. Journal of Educational Review and Research, 1(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.26737/jerr.v1i1.506

Baia, O. G. (2020). Proposal of public policy regarding the integration of financial education classes in Romania. Technium Soc. Sci. J., 3, 7.

Hayat, A. (2018). Reformasi Pendidikan Non Formal Untuk Mengurangi Pengangguran di Era Otonomi Daerah; Perspektif Governance. Prosiding Universitas Wiraraja.

Huang, A. R., & Revina, S. (2020). The Struggle to Recruit Good Teachers in Indonesia?: Institutional and Social Dysfunctions. RESE: Research on Improving Systems of Eduction.

Kadarmanta, A., & Mahmudin Yasin, N. F. (2021). Developing and improving Competences of Educators/Teaching Staffs of Indonesian National Police School (Sekolah Polisi Negara/Spn). Psychology and Education Journal, 58(2), 120–125. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17762/pae.v58i2.1061

Komariya, L., Amon, L., Wardhana, A., Priyandono, L., Poernomo, S. A., Januar, S., Harliansyah, H., Satriawarman, T., Bustami, M. R., Heriman, H., Firmansyah, F., Pratama, P. A., Sumantri, W. H., Rianti, R., Rusdawati, R., Yusniar, Y., Sripeni, S., Ping, T., Rohana, R., … Monica, M. V. (2021). Manajemen Pendidik & Tenaga Kependidikan Abad 21. Aceh: Yayasan Penerbit Muhammad Zaini.

Ridwan, I., & Sumirat, I. R. (2021). Kebijakan Desentralisasi Pendidikan Di Era Otonomi Daerah. Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter JAWARA (Jujur, Adil, Wibawa, Amanah, Religius, Akuntabel), 7(1).

Rus, M., Sandu, M., & Tasente, T. (2020). Introduction to the analysis of public policies. Technium Soc. Sci. J., 3, 3.

Setiawan, A., Hanim, Z., Komariyah, L., & Salim, N. A. (2020). Empowerment Management Of High School Teachers In Kutai Kartanegara. International Journal of Latest Research in Humanities and Social Science (IJLRHSS). http://www.ijlrhss.com/vol3-iss12.html

Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Manajemen (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Kombinasi (Mixed Methods), Penelitian Tindakan (Action Research, dan Penelitian Evaluasi). Bandung: Alfabeta Cv.

Ulum, I. (2015). Intellectual capital disclosure: Suatu analisis dengan four way numerical coding system. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Auditing Indonesia, 19(1), 39–50.

Undang-Undang RI. (2003). Undang-Undangan Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/43920/uu-no-20-tahun-2003

Wahab, A., Zulmaulida, R., Saputra, E., Sari, D. D., Maghfuroh, L., Suseni, K. A., Fazilla, S., Akmal, N., Lorensius, L., & Teuku Sanwil. (2022). Pengantar Pendidikan untuk Perguruan Tinggi. Yayasan Penerbit Muhammad Zaini.

Wahab, S. A. (2021). Analisis kebijakan: dari formulasi ke penyusunan model-model implementasi kebijakan publik. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Warman, W., Nurlaili, N., Lorensius, L., Sanda, Y., Sutriyanto, A., Kristianus, K., Sukur, P., Rejeki, S., Nurlaelah, N., & Fatcholis, F. (2022). Perilaku Organisasi di Bidang Pendidikan. Jejak Pustaka.