Competitive Advantage as Role Moderation Between System-Driven Performance and Economic Performance

Dirvi Surya  Abbas; Daniel  Rahandri; Imas  Kismanah; Anita  Ardiyanti

doi:10.35877/454RI.qems886

Authors

Dirvi Surya Abbas Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang
Daniel Rahandri Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang
Imas Kismanah Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang
Anita Ardiyanti Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.qems886

Keywords:

Economic Performance, Corporate Image, Corporate Social Performance, Competitive Advantage

Abstract

This paper aims to determine the relationship between environmental performance, corporate image, corporate social performance on economic performance by including competitive advantage as a moderator, as well as to describe why and how it is important to carry out corporate care for the environment by companies. This study also aims to expand the topic of discussion by including more variables related to aspects that affect company performance. The population of this study includes all manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in the 2014-2018 Period. The sampling technique used the purposive sampling technique. Based on predetermined criteria obtained 11 companies. The type of data used is secondary data obtained from the Indonesia Stock Exchange website. The analytical method used is panel data logistic regression analysis. This paper provides an empirical view of how environmental factors greatly affect the company's performance. This shows that the increase in good company performance generally comes from companies that pay attention to corporate social responsibility, so that they can have an advantage in competition in the market. Based on the research approach method used, this is a weakness of this study because this research cannot be generalized. It is hoped that future researchers will be able to explore the proportions of other variables that can be used in further research. These results support the legitimacy theory; one of the arguments (O’Donovan 2002) states that in the view of legitimacy, the relationship between profitability and the level of social performance is when the company has a high level of profit, the company considers it unnecessary to report things that can interfere with information. Consumers who are increasingly aware of environmental issues will look for environmentally friendly products. As a follow-up impact, the company will look for suppliers who can solve ecological problems; this will affect increasing the selling power of products or services and can improve the company's economic performance. This paper fulfills the identified need to study how environmental performance supports business excellence thereby improving company performance

References

[1] Abbas, Dirvi Surya and Imam Hidayat. 2021. “Enterprise Risk Management, Inventory Intensity, Pre-Tax Foreign Income and Economic Performance: Competitive Advantage as Moderator.” LINGUISTICA ANTVERPIENSIA 3518–29.
[2] Cegli?ski, Pawe? and Anna Wi?niewska. 2017. “CSR as a Source of Competitive Advantage: The Case Study of Polpharma Group.” Journal of Corporate Responsibility and Leadership 3(4):9.
[3] Chang, Ching Hsun. 2011. “The Influence of Corporate Environmental Ethics on Competitive Advantage: The Mediation Role of Green Innovation.” Journal of Business Ethics 104(3):361–70.
[4] Dewi, Kadek Kristina Surya and Gerianta Wirawan Yasa. 2020. “The Effects of Executive and Company Characteristics on Tax Aggressiveness.” Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Bisnis 15(2):280.
[5] Duanmu, Jing-Lin, Maoliang Bu, and Russell Pittman. 2018. “Does Market Competition Dampen Environmental Performance? Evidence from China.” Strategic Management Journal 39(11):3006–30.
[6] Ferryanto, Aditya and Saarce Elsye Hatane. 2015. “Analisa Pengaruh Corporate Image Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan Perbankan Di Surabaya.” Business Accounting Review, Vol. 3, No. 2 3(2):91–100.
[7] Filbeck, Greg and Raymond F. Gorman. 2004. “The Relationship between the Environmental and Financial Performance of Public Utilities.” Environmental and Resource Economics 29(2):137–57.
[8] Hakim, Mohamad and Dirvi Abbas. 2019. “PENGARUH UKURAN PERUSAHAAN, STRUKTUR MODAL, LIKUIDITAS, INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY SET (IOS), DAN PROFITABILITAS TERHADAP KUALITAS LABA (Perusahaan Makanan Dan Minuman Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2013-2017).” Competitive Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan 3(2):26–51.
[9] Hanafi, Muhammad, Dermawan Wibisono, Kuntoro Mangkusubroto, Manahan Siallagan, and Mila Jamilah Khatun Badriyah. 2017. “Modelling Competitive Advantage of Nation: A Literature Review.” Competitiveness Review 27(4):335–65.
[10] Ma, Hao. 2000. “Competitive Advantage and Firm Performance.” Competitiveness Review 10(2):15–32.
[11] Mufid, Muhammad Nur, Maslichah, and Afifudin. 2018. “PENGARUH ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE TERHADAP ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE (Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2014-2016 Dan Megikuti Program PROPER Tahun 2014-2016).” Jurnal Ilmiah Riset Akuntansi 7(5):59–72.
[12] O’Donovan, Gary. 2002. “Environmental Disclosures in the Annual Report.” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 15(3):344–71.
[13] Saputra, Indra and Etty Murwaningsari. 2021. “Do Environmental Performance and Disclosure Contribute to the Economic Performance? The Moderating Role of Corporate Action.” Journal of Accounting Research, Organization and Economics 4(1):29–47.
[14] Sara, I. Made, Komang Adi Kurniawan Saputra, and I. Wayan Kartika Jaya Utama. 2021. “The Effects of Strategic Planning, Human Resource and Asset Management on Economic Productivity: A Case Study in Indonesia.” Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business 8(4):381–89.
[15] Schillemans, Thomas. 2013. “Moving Beyond The Clash of Interests: On Stewardship Theory and the Relationships between Central Government Departments and Public Agencies.” Public Management Review 15(4):541–62.
[16] Sölvell, Örjan. 2015. “The Competitive Advantage of Nations 25 Years – Opening up New Perspectives on Competitiveness.” Competitiveness Review 25(5):471–81.
[17] Stonehouse, George and Brian Snowdon. 2007. “Competitive Advantage Revisited: Michael Porter on Strategy and Competitiveness.” Journal of Management Inquiry 16(3):256–73.
[18] Triani, Ni Nyoman Alit, Made Dudy Satyawan, and Merlyana Dwinda Yanthi. 2017. “Determining The Effectiveness of Going Concern Audit Opinion by ISA 570.” Asian Journal of Accounting Research 2(2):29–35.
[19] Wibisono, Melisa, Stevanus Hadi Darmadji, and Aurelia Carina Sutanto. 2014. “Hubungan Antara Corporate Social Performance (Csp) Dan Corporate Financial Performance (Cfp).” Prosiding Penelitian Sivitas Akademika Unisba (Sosial Dan Humaniora) 3(1):535–42.
[20] Wirawan, Wina Permatasari. 2016. “Analisis Hubungan Corporate Social Performance ( CSP ) Dengan Kinerja Keuangan Bank Syariah Yang Terdaftar Di OJK (Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Tahun 2013-2015).” Skripsi, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.