The Impact of Leadership Style and Compensation on Teacher Performance: A Quantitative Analysis

  • Hanif Syaifur Rabbani Information Management, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Yapan Surabaya, Indonesia (ID)
  • Rifki Suwaji Information Management, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Yapan Surabaya, Indonesia (ID)
Keywords: Leadership Style, Compensation, Teacher Performance

Viewed = 0 time(s)

Abstract

This study examines the influence of leadership style and compensation on teacher performance at SMA Tahfidz Al Amien. The study employs a quantitative approach with a causal explanatory design. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire distributed to all 32 teachers at the school, selected through saturated sampling. Each variable was measured using multiple indicators assessed on a Likert scale. The research instrument was validated and tested for reliability, confirming that all items were valid and reliable. Data analysis was conducted using multiple linear regression with SPSS software version 16. The results show that leadership style and compensation simultaneously influence teacher performance, with a coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.507. This indicates that the two independent variables together explain 50.7% of the variance in teacher performance. The regression results also reveal that leadership style has a significant but negative effect on teacher performance, while compensation has a significant and stronger positive effect. The findings of this study suggest that compensation contributes more significantly to improving teacher performance than leadership style. These results highlight the importance of compensation as a motivational factor and point to the need for leadership approaches that better align with teacher expectations and performance goals.



References

Adinata, Arlan. 2011. Pengaruh Kompensasi Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Dinas Pendapatan Daerah kota Bogor. Bogor: ITB
Ahmad, Ismail, La Ode. 2017. Konsep Penilaian Guru dan Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Makassar: Universitas Negeri Alauddin.
Al Faruq, MU, & Suwaji, R. (2024). Pengaruh Motivasi Kerja, Kepemimpinan, Dan Disiplin Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Pada PT Petronika di Gresik. Jurnal Informasi dan Teknologi
Andriyani, Eka, Emelia. 2016. Pengaruh Kepemimpinan terhadap Kinerja Karyawan. Yogyakarta: Universitas Sanata Dharma
Aprilia, Puja. 2018. Pengaruh kompensasi terhadap kinerja pegawai negri sipil pada kantor dinas kebersihan dan pertamanan kota medan. Medan: Universitas Sumatera Utara.
Aprilita, Bina. 2012. Dimensi-dimensi gaya kepemimpinan bass dan avolio menurut presepsi karyawan dalam membangun gaya kepemimpinan yang efektif. Semarang: Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Diponegoro.
Ardana. 2012. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu. Azwar, Budi. 2013. “Kajian pengaruh kompensasi terhadap kinerja guru SLTA di Kecamatan Bangkinang.” Jurnal Manajemen.
Ferdinand, Augusty. 2011. Metode Penelitian Manajemen. Semarang: Indoprint Handoko, T. Hani. 2011. Manajemen Personalia dan Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: Penerbit BPFE.
Fitri, A. (2020). Pengaruh Kompensasi terhadap Kinerja Guru. Jurnal Administrasi dan Kependidikan, 5(1), 87–95.
Gunawan, H., Purnomo, M., & Sari, L. (2022). Compensation System and Its Impact on Employee Performance in Education Institutions. International Journal of Social and Management Studies, 3(2), 112–120.
Haris, Triyanto.2012. Pengaruh Kompensasi Terhadap Prestasi Kerja Karyawan Pada Perum Perumnas Regional VII Makasar. Makassar: Universitas Hasanudin
Hasibuan, Malayu. 2013. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
Hidayah, Nurul. 2016. Pengaruh Kompensasi Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Melalu Kepuasan Kerja Sebagai Variabel Intervening. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negri Yogyakarta.
Kartono, Kartini. 2002. Pemimpin dan Kepemimpinan. Jakarta: Rajawali Press
Lestari, Epo. 2013. Jurnal Lentera Bisnis, Pengaruh Kompensasi terhadap kinerja karyawan pada PT. Lane Archive Management. Jakarta: Politeknik LP3I Jakarta
Mulyanto, Wulandari. 2010. Penelitian: Metode Analisis. Semarang: CV Agung Semarang.
Nurlia, R. (2021). Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan terhadap Kinerja Guru. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 9(2), 134–142.
Oktawati, Desy.2016. Pengaruh Kompensasi dan Motivasi Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai pada Dinas Pendapatan Pengelolaan Keuangan dan Asset Daerah Kabupaten Salorangun. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka
Pitri, Alisyah. 2017. Jurnal Manajemen, Kepemimpinan, dan Supervisi Pendidikan. Batusangkar: Peneliti Independen IAIN.
Putra, D. H., & Isnaini, R. (2023). Compensation and Teacher Productivity: Evidence from Indonesian Private Schools. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi, 16(1), 73–81.
Rivai, Veithzal dan Sagala. 2014. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia untuk Perusahaan. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Rohma, Nurlia. 2017. Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan pada PT. Al-ijarah Indonesia Finance Lampung. Lampung: Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan
Siswanto, Dio Rendyco. 2017. Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis, Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan (Studi pada divisi HRD) PT. Preefort Indonesia. Malang. Universitas Brawijaya.
Susanto, A., & Fitria, H. (2022). The Effect of Transformational Leadership on Teacher Performance through Job Satisfaction. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 12(4), 55–66.
Sutikno, Sobry M. 2014. Pemimpin dan Gaya Kepemimpinan, Edisi pertama. Lombok: Holistica.
Thoha, Miftah. 2010. Kepemimpinan dalam Manajemen. Jakarta: Rajawali Press V.W, Sujarweni. 2015. SPSS Untuk Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Baru Press
Yensi, Astuty. 2010. Jurnal Kependidikan Triadik, Pengaruh Kompensasi terhadap Kinerja Guru di SMA Negeri 2 Argamakmur Bengkulu Utara. Bengkulu:Untiversitas Bengkulu
Zain, Rinduan. 2017. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, Pengaruh Kompensasi Kerja terhadap kinerja dosen fakultas ilmu Tabiyah dan Keguruan UIN Sunan Kalijaga. Yogyakarta.
Published
2025-04-30
Section
Articles
How to Cite
Rabbani, H. S., & Rifki Suwaji. (2025). The Impact of Leadership Style and Compensation on Teacher Performance: A Quantitative Analysis. Quantitative Economics and Management Studies, 6(2), 198-204. https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.qems3849