Articles | 2024-12-31

Influence of Leadership Style, and Organizational Culture Towards Organizational Citizenship Behavior Through Job Satisfaction as an Intervening Variable

Muhammad Zhulali Nauli, Dudung Hadiwijaya, Priyo Susilo
Quantitative Economics and Management Studies, Vol. 5 No. 6 (2024), pp. 1166-1180 https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.qems2946 Published: 2024-12-31
Get Permissions

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation is to determine the influence of Organisational Culture and Leadership Style on OCB, with job satisfaction serving as an intervening variable. The data collection procedure utilises a purposive sampling type with a non-probability sampling technique, and this research employs a quantitative-associative approach. The Directorate General of Customs and Excise employs a Google Forms questionnaire to distribute data to its personnel. The software Smart-PLS is employed to evaluate the reliability of PLS-SEM-based models. The results of the Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) analysis and hypothesis testing conducted in this study were used to derive conclusions. Organisational Culture and Leadership Style have a beneficial effect on OCB and Job Satisfaction, as evidenced by the results of the investigations that have been conducted. Additionally, Leadership Style has a substantial indirect impact on Job Satisfaction, which in turn affects OCB. As an outcome of organisational culture, job satisfaction has an insignificant indirect effect on OCB.

Keywords

References (32)

  1. Ahmad, S. (2021). Motivation and performance: A psychological process. International Journal of Business and Management Research, 9(2), 104–112.
  2. Aldag, R., & Reschke, W. (1997). Employee value added: Measuring discretionary effort and its value to the organization. Center for Organization Effectiveness, 608, 833–3332.
  3. Alhashedi, A. A. A., Bardai, B., Al-Dubai, M. M. M., & Alaghbari, M. A. (2021). Organizational citizenship behavior role in mediating the effect of transformational leadership on organizational performance in gold industry of Saudi Arabia. Business: Theory and Practice, 22(1), 39–54.
  4. Ali, A., Hussain Khan, I., Ch, M. A., & Akram Ch, A. S. (2018). Level of job satisfaction among employees of banking industries at lahore 2016. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences: Proceedings, 7(3 (s)), pp-92.
  5. Ali, B. J., & Anwar, G. (2021). An empirical study of employees’ motivation and its influence job satisfaction. Ali, BJ, & Anwar, G.(2021). An Empirical Study of Employees’ Motivation and Its Influence Job Satisfaction. International Journal of Engineering, Business and Management, 5(2), 21–30.
  6. Anderson, M. H., & Sun, P. Y. T. (2017). Reviewing Leadership Styles: Overlaps and the Need for a New ‘Full‐Range’ Theory. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(1), 76–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12082
  7. Andriani, S., Kesumawati, N., & Kristiawan, M. (2018). The influence of the transformational leadership and work motivation on teachers performance. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 7(7), 19–29.
  8. Belıas, D., & Koustelıos, A. (2014). Organizational culture and job satisfaction: A review. International Review of Management and Marketing, 4(2), 132–149.
  9. Diener, E., & Lucas, R. E. (2019). Personality traits. General Psychology: Required Reading, 278. https://www.academia.edu/download/60283871/General_Psychology_-__Required_Reading20190813-110996-103829r.pdf#page=280
  10. Ertosun, O. G., & Adiguzel, Z. (2018). Leadership, Personal Values and Organizational Culture. In H. Dincer, Ü. Hacioglu, & S. Yüksel (Eds.), Strategic Design and Innovative Thinking in Business Operations (pp. 51–74). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77622-4_3

How to Cite

Muhammad Zhulali Nauli, Dudung Hadiwijaya, & Priyo Susilo. (2024). Influence of Leadership Style, and Organizational Culture Towards Organizational Citizenship Behavior Through Job Satisfaction as an Intervening Variable. Quantitative Economics and Management Studies, 5(6), 1166–1180. https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.qems2946