Evaluation of the Impact of Probity Audit on Fraud Prevention Influence in Government Procurement of Goods/Services

  • Eka Adi Kurniawan Universitas Mercu Buana, Indonesia (ID)
  • Mawardi Amin Universitas Mercu Buana (ID)
  • Humiras Hardi Purba Universitas Mercu Buana, Indonesia (ID)
Keywords: Evaluation, Government Procurement, Prevention Influencem

Viewed = 0 time(s)

Abstract

The aim of this research is to conduct an evaluation of probity audit on fraud prevention influence in government procurement of goods services. This type of research is quantitative research. The amples involving 84 respondents. The research data sources were primary data and secondary data. Primary data sourced from a questionnaire that had been tested for validity and reliability. In this research, the researchers used the SEM-PLS (partial least squares path modeling) method. There are several factors that support and hinder the effectiveness of implementing probity audits in the procurement of goods and services with current conditions within the DKI Jakarta Provincial Inspectorate. The supporting factors include the available implementation budget, experienced and capable human resources in conducting probity audits, as well as availability of supporting equipment that can be adequate for carrying out a probability audit.



Author Biography

Mawardi Amin, Universitas Mercu Buana

Universitas Mercu Buana

References

Andon, P., Free, C., & Scard, B. (2015). Pathways to accountant fraud: Australian evidence and analysis. Accounting Research Journal, 28(1), 10–44. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-06-2014-0058
Arifin, M. F. (2020). Kesulitan Belajar Siswa Dan Penanganannya Pada Pembelajaran Matematika Sd/Mi. Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian, 1(5), 989–1000. https://doi.org/10.47492/jip.v1i5.181 (https://doi.org/10.20885/jaai.vol24.iss1.art2)

Bagraff, R. A. (2021). Kompleksitas Kelembagaan Dalam Penerapan Probity Audit Pengadaan Barang Dan Jasa Pada Inspektorat Kabupaten Jombang. ABIS: Accounting and Business Information Systems Journal, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.22146/abis.v9i2.65945
Mayanti, S., Dewi Ayu Safitri, S., Kamal Reza, M., & Penulis, I. (2021). Sistem Informasi Manajemen Pemesanan Jasa Percetakan Berbasis Web. Jurnal Sistem Informasi Akuntansi , 02(02), 60–67.
Ningsih, N. S., & Wahyuni, I. S. (2022). Faktor Yang Berhubungan Dengan Kejadian Kekurangan Energi Kronik (Kek) Pada Ibu Hamil. Bunda Edu-Midwifery Journal (BEMJ), 5(2), 94–100. https://doi.org/10.54100/bemj.v5i2.75 (https://doi.org/10.54408/jabter.v1i6.107)

Rijal, S., Bachmid, S., & Supardi, S. (2022). Analisis Implementasi Probity Audit dalam Proses Pelaksanaan Pekerjaan Jalan (Hotmix/Beton). Jurnal Konstruksi, 1(3), 1–12. https://mail.pasca-umi.ac.id/index.php/kons/article/view/1024/1168
Thomas, R., Kanso, A., & Sedor, J. R. (2008). Chronic Kidney Disease and Its Complications. Primary Care - Clinics in Office Practice, 35(2), 329–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pop.2008.01.008
Thomas, K., & Purcell, A. J. (2019). Local government audit committees: a behaviour framework for effective audit committee performance. Australian Accounting Review, 29(2), 418-437.

Wleklik, M., Uchmanowicz, I., Jankowska, E. A., Vitale, C., Lisiak, M., Drozd, M., Pobrotyn, P., Tkaczyszyn, M., & Lee, C. (2020). Multidimensional Approach to Frailty. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00564
Published
2024-10-01
Section
Articles
How to Cite
Kurniawan, E. A., Amin, M., & Purba, H. H. (2024). Evaluation of the Impact of Probity Audit on Fraud Prevention Influence in Government Procurement of Goods/Services. Quantitative Economics and Management Studies, 5(5), 1132-1141. https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.qems2819