Analysis of the Application and Compliance of PSAP No.13 Regarding the Presentation of BLU Financial Statements at Puskesmas Lima Puluh
https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.qems2693
Viewed = 0 time(s)
Abstract
Financial reports are very important for companies, so companies are obliged to make financial reports according to applicable standards. This research was conducted with the aim of knowing the presentation financial reports of BLU UPT's Puskesmas Lima Puluh and its suitability were reviewed from PSAP Number 13. To obtain in-depth and accurate results, this research focused on UPT. Puskesmas Lima Puluh in Batubara Regency. This research uses a qualitative method with a descriptive approach, collecting data in three ways, namely observation, interviews and documentation. The analysis technique used in this research is the Dean J. Champion method. The results of this research indicate that the presentation of UPT's financial reports. Limapuluh Community Health Center has three reporting components, namely BOK (Health Operational Assistance), JKN (National Health Insurance), and PAD (Regional Original Income). In accordance with PSAP Number 13, the UPT financial report. The Fifty Health Center in 2023 is not yet as it should be, even though there are several posts in its components which are almost in accordance with the results of calculations using the Dean J. Champion method, namely 21.05%.
References
Aken, J. v., Chandrasekaran, A., & Halman, J. (2016). Conducting and publishing design science research: Inaugural essay of the design science department of the Journal of Operations Management. Journal of Operations Management, 47-48, 1-8.
Andrias, M. S. (2023). Pendekatan design science: Metode penelitian alternatif bagi mahasiswa Magister Manajemen. Jurnal Manajemen dan Usahawan Indonesia, 46(2), 131-142.
Brocke, J. v., Hevner, A., & Maedche, A. (2020a). Design Science Research. Cases. Springer.
Brocke, J. v., Hevner, A., & Maedche, A. (2020b). Introduction to Design Science Research. In J. v. Brocke, A. Hevner, & A. Maedche (Eds.), Design Science Research. Cases (pp. 1-13). Springer.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319-340. https://doi.org/doi: 10.2307/249008
Deloitte. (2017). Deloitte Global Human Capital Trends: Rewriting the rules for the digital age.
Eckerson, W. (2011). Performance dashboards : measuring, monitoring, and managing your business. John Wiley & Sons.
Franklin, A., Gantela, S., Shifarraw, S., Johnson, T. R., Robinson, D. J., King, B. R., Mehta, A. M., Maddow, C. L., Hoot, N. R., Nguyen, V., Rubio, A., Zhang, J., & Okafor, N. G. (2017). Dashboard visualizations: Supporting real-time throughput decision-making. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 71, 211-221. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2017.05.024
Han, J. H., & Sa, H. J. (2022). Acceptance of and satisfaction with online educational classes through the technology acceptance model (TAM): the COVID‐19 situation in Korea. Asia Pacific Education Review, 23, 403-415. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-021-09716-7
Hansoti, B. (2010). Business Intelligence Dashboard in Decision Making. In C. o. T. T. a. Projects (Ed.), College of Technology Directed Projects. Indiana.
Hevner, A., & Chatterjee, S. (2010). Design science research in Information Systems. Integrated Series in Information Systems, 22, 9-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5653-8_2
Hevner, A. R. (2007). A three cycle view of design science research. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 19(2).
Hong, X., Zhang, M., & Liu, Q. (2021). Preschool teachers’ technology acceptance during the COVID-19: An adapted technology acceptance model. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.691492
Kintz, M., Kochanowski, M., & Koetter, F. (2017). Creating user-specific business process monitoring dashboards with a model-driven approach. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development 353-361. https://doi.org/10.5220/0006135203530361
Lawson-Body, A., Lawson-Body, L., & Illia, A. (2023). Data visualization: Developing and validating dashboard measurement instruments. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 63(3). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2022.2073295
Madsen, S., C., H., & Nielsen, J. (2020). Accelerated digital transformation: The case of the online university caused by Covid-19. AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), 11.
Marangunic, N., & Granic, A. (2015). Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013. Univ Access Inf Soc, 14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1
Matheus, R., Janssen, M., & Maheshwari, D. (2020). Data science empowering the public: Data-driven dashboards for transparent and accountable decision-making in smart cities. Government Information Quarterly, 37, 1-9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.01.006
Nicolás-Agustín, Á., Jiménez-Jiménez, D., & Maeso-Fernandez, F. (2022). The role of human resource practices in the implementation of digital transformation. International Journal of Manpower, 43(2), 395-410.
Pandza, K., & Thorpe, R. (2010). Management as design, but what kind of design? An appraisal of the design science analogy for management. British Journal of Management, 21, 171-186. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00623.x
Papakostas, C., Troussas, C., Krouska, A., & Sgouropoulou, C. (2023). Exploring users’ behavioral intention to adopt mobile augmented reality in education through an extended Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal OF Human-Computer Interaction, 39(6). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2062551
Schilirò, D. (2021). Digital transformation, COVID-19, and the future of work. Department of Economics, University of Messina.
Sheldon, P. (2016). Facebook friend request: Applying the theory of reasoned action to student-teacher-relationships on Facebook. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 60(2), 269–285. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2016.1164167
Sultana, S., Akter, S., Kyriazis, E., & Wamba, S. F. (2021). Architecting and developing big Data-Driven Innovation (DDI)
in the digital economy. Journal of Global Information Management, 29(3), 165-187.
Team, R. C. (2020, 6 June). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. https://www.R-project.org/
Tregua, M., Mele, C., Russo-Spena, T., Marzullo, M. L., & Carotenuto, A. (2021). Digital transformation in the era of COVID-19. AHFE, 97-105. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80840-2_10
Turner, M., Kitchenham, B., Brereton, P., Charters, S., & Budgen, D. (2010). Does the technology acceptance model predict actual use? A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 52, 463-479.
Van Rossum, G., & Drake, F. L. (2009). Python 3 Reference Manual: (Python Documentation Manual Part 2). CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=KIybQQAACAAJ
Wallace, L. G., & Sheetz, S. D. (2014). The adoption of software measures: A technology acceptance model (TAM) perspective. Information & Management, 51, 249-259. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2013.12.003
Zehir, C., Karaboğa, T., & Başar, D. (2020). The transformation of human resource management and its impact on overall business performance: Big data analytics and AI technologies in strategic HRM. In U. H. (ed.) (Ed.), Digital Business Strategies in Blockchain Ecosystems. Springer.
Zhang, J., & Chen, Z. (2021). Exploring Human Resource Management Digital Transformation in the Digital Age. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01214-y
Zingde, S., & Shroff, N. (2020). The role of dashboards in business decision making and Performance management Doctoral Research Conference in Management, India.
Copyright (c) 2024 Faiz Mukaffi Achmadia, Aqwa Naser Daulay, Kusmilawaty Kusmilawaty
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
