FMEA-Based Logistic Regression Model for the Evaluation of Photovoltaic Power Plant Risk
https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.qems2645
Viewed = 0 time(s)
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to identify the primary operational risks associated with photovoltaic power plants and develop effective risk management strategies to optimize the operation of existing plants and mitigate risks for future plants that will be constructed as part of the new renewable energy (EBT) transition agenda until 2030. The integration of Failure Mode and Effect Method Analysis (FMEA) with logistic regression provides the formation of a risk treatment ranking that management should prioritize. Risk assessment relies on the expertise and experience of professionals in performing their responsibilities associated with photovoltaic power plants. The research findings have identified 10 potential risks associated with improving photovoltaic power plants operations to prevent failure or damage to the system. These risks are categorized into five stages of the operation process: planning and procurement, installation, operation, and maintenance. Risk rankings and mitigation are generated to prioritize actions aimed at limiting the occurrence of failure/damage and low-capacity factors in photovoltaic power plants as recommendations for the management.
References
Ardian Burhandono, & Sinaga, N. (2022). Menjaga Keandalan Sistem PLTS dengan Metode Failure Mode Effect Analysis (FMEA). Jurnal Teknik Industri, 12(1), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.25105/jti.v12i1.13958
Bansal, N., Jaiswal, S. P., & Singh, G. (2021). Comparative investigation of performance evaluation, degradation causes, impact and corrective measures for ground mount and rooftop solar PV plants – A review. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 47(February), 101526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.101526
Bhattacharjee, P., Dey, V., & Mandal, U. K. (2020). Risk assessment by failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) using an interval number based logistic regression model. Safety Science, 132(September), 104967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104967
Gargama, H., & Chaturvedi, S. (2015). Criticality Assessment Models for Failure Mode Effects and Criticality Analysis Using Fuzzy Logic. April 2011. https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.2010.2103672
Gaurav, S., Chileshe, N., & Ma, T. (2011). Project Risk Analysis of Solar Energy Project Delays in India. December, 1–11.
Herz, M., Lindig, S., Friesen, G., Moser, D., Jahn, U., & Koentges, M. (2023). Identify , analyse and mitigate — Quantification of technical risks in PV power systems. October 2022, 1285–1298. https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.3633
Hilbe, J. M. (2009). Logistic Regression Models. CRC Press.
Horváth, D., & Szabó, R. Z. (2018). Evolution of photovoltaic business models: Overcoming the main barriers of distributed energy deployment. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 90(June 2017), 623–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.101
Ioannou, A., Angus, A., & Brennan, F. (2017). Risk-based methods for sustainable energy system planning : A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 74(December 2016), 602–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.02.082
Kumar, G., Ghosh, S., A, T. S. P., Ramasubramanian, B., Samanta, A., Rathour, A., Kin, T., Wong, S., Chakrabortty, S., Ramakrishna, S., & Kumar, A. (2023). Results in Engineering Maximizing solar energy production in ASEAN region : Opportunity and challenges. Results in Engineering, 20(June), 101525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101525
Li, J., Zhang, Y., Fang, H., & Fang, S. (2023). Risk evaluation of photovoltaic power systems: An improved failure mode and effect analysis under uncertainty. Journal of Cleaner Production, 414(February). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137620
Liu, H. C., Liu, L., & Liu, N. (2013). Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: A literature review. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(2), 828–838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.08.010
Mensah, L. D., Yamoah, J. O., & Adaramola, M. S. (2019). Performance evaluation of a utility-scale grid-tied solar photovoltaic (PV) installation in Ghana. Energy for Sustainable Development, 48, 82–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2018.11.003
Mohamed, S. P. A., Firoz, N., Sadhikh, M., & Dadu, M. (2019). Risk Analysis in Implementation of Solar Energy Projects in Kerala. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1355(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1355/1/012026
Pimpalkar, R., Sahu, A., Patil, R. B., & Roy, A. (2023). A comprehensive review on failure modes and effect analysis of solar photovoltaic system. Materials Today: Proceedings, 77, 687–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.11.353
Rencana Usaha Penyediaan Tenaga Listrik (RUPTL) PT PLN (Persero) 2021-2030., Rencana Usaha Penyediaan Tenaga Listrik 2021-2030 2019 (2021).
Rajput, P., Malvoni, M., Kumar, N. M., Sastry, O. S., & Tiwari, G. N. (2019). Risk priority number for understanding the severity of photovoltaic failure modes and their impacts on performance degradation. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 16(November). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2019.100563
Sekretaris DirJen EBTKE. (2016). Buku Statistik EBTKE (p. 56p).
Shebl, N. A., Franklin, B. D., & Barber, N. (2012). Failure mode and effects analysis outputs : are they valid ?
Shojaeimehr, S., & Rahmani, D. (2022). Risk management of photovoltaic power plants using a novel fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method based on prospect theory: A sustainable development approach. Energy Conversion and Management: X, 16(August), 100293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2022.100293
Stamatis, D. H. (2003). Failure Mode and Effect Analysis: FMEA From Theory to Execution. In American Society for Quality (Vol. 38, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1996.10484424
Copyright (c) 2024 Dianita Fitriani Pogram, Ruslan Prijadi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
