PDF Get rights and content
Articles | 2023-04-30

The Effect of Work Time, Workload, Work Ethos, and Work Environment on Job Satisfaction Employee at Government Agriculture Service Labuhanbatu District

Siti Rahmaida Siregar, Nova Jayanti Harahap, Abd. Halim
Quantitative Economics and Management Studies, Vol. 4 No. 2 (2023), pp. 383-391 https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.qems1612 Published: 2023-04-30
Get Permissions

Abstract

This research aims to analyze The Influence of Working Period, Workload, Work Ethic and Work Environment on Employee Job Satisfaction at the Agriculture Office of the Government of Labuhanbatu Regency. The research method used in this research is quantitative. In this study, the population were employees of the Labuhanbatu Regency Government Agriculture Service as many as 42 people. The research sample usessaturated sampling technique by attracting the entire existing population to be used as a research sample witha total of 42 people. Data collection techniques used were observation, documentation studies and questionnaires. The method of analysis of this research is multiple linear regression with the SPSS program. The results of the research prove that the Working Periodpositive and significant effect onEmployee Job Satisfaction at the Agriculture Office of the Labuhanbatu Regency Government. Workloadpositive and significant effect onEmployee Job Satisfaction at the Agriculture Office of the Labuhanbatu Regency Government. Work ethicpositive and significant effect onEmployee Job Satisfaction at the Agriculture Office of the Labuhanbatu Regency Government. Work environmentpositive and significant effect onEmployee Job Satisfaction at the Agriculture Office of the Labuhanbatu Regency Government. Tenure, Workload, Work Ethic and Work Environmentsimultaneously positive and significant effect onEmployee Job Satisfaction at the Agriculture Office of the Labuhanbatu Regency Government. The coefficient of determination is 0.824, meaning that employee job satisfaction can be explained by variablesWorking Period (X1), Workload (X2), Work Ethic (X3) and Work Environment (X4)of 82.4%, while the remaining 17.6% can be explained by other variables not examined in this study.

Keywords

Workload, Work Ethic, Work Environment,Employee Job Satisfaction

References (18)

  1. AA Anwar Prabu Mangkunegara. 2016. Company Human Resource Management. Bandung : PT. Rosdakarya youth.
  2. Agung Aditya Saputra, (2022). "The Influence of Compensation, Work Environment and Workload on Employee Job Satisfaction". Postgraduate, Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa University. Technomedia Journal (TMJ) Vol. 7 No. 1.
  3. Anang Firmansyah, and Budi W. Mahardika, 2018. Introduction to Management, Yogyakarta: Deepublish.
  4. Afandi. 2018. Human Resource Management (Theory, Concepts and Indicators). NusaMedia. Yogyakarta.
  5. Aprilyanti, S. (2017). The Effect of Age and Years of Service on Work Productivity (Case Study: PT. OASIS Water International Palembang Branch). Journal of Industrial Systems and Management, 1(2), 68. https://doi.org/10.30656/jsmi.v1i2.413.
  6. Chealsy Lawren and Sanny Ekawati, (2023). "The Influence of Work Motivation, Compensation, and Work Environment on Job Satisfaction of PT TSA Employees in Bogor". Faculty of Economics and Business, Tarumanagara University, Jakarta. Journal of Managerial and Entrepreneurship, Vol. 05, No. 01, January 2023.
  7. Febri Rudiansyah, 2014, Influence of Incentives, Level of Education and Years of Service on Employee Productivity. Management journal. ISSN: 1987-6285.
  8. Ginting, Desmond. Work ethic: A Guide to Being a Smart Employee. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo, 2016.
  9. Ghozali, Imam. 2018. Application of Multivariate Analysis with the IBM SPSS 25 Program. Diponegoro University Publishing Agency: Semarang.
  10. Handoko, T. Hani. 2012. Personnel Management and Human Resources. Yogyakarta. BPFE.

How to Cite

Siregar, S. R. ., Harahap, N. J. ., & Halim, A. (2023). The Effect of Work Time, Workload, Work Ethos, and Work Environment on Job Satisfaction Employee at Government Agriculture Service Labuhanbatu District. Quantitative Economics and Management Studies, 4(2), 383–391. https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.qems1612