Articles | 2023-04-30

The Impact of Transjakarta Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Operationalization on Economic Growth and Unemployment Rate in DKI Jakarta Province

Rico Bagus Satrio, Achmad Kemal Hidayat, Amelia Hayati
Quantitative Economics and Management Studies, Vol. 4 No. 2 (2023), pp. 261-277 https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.qems1522 Published: 2023-04-30
Get Permissions

Abstract

Special Capital District Jakarta province is one of the most populous cities in Indonesia. People commute every day mostly by using private vehicles to meet their needs. Somehow another alternative comes as one of the longest lengths of BRT track in the world, operationalization of the Transjakarta BRT is expected to be able to contribute to economic growth and improve people's accessibility so that it could reduce the unemployment rate. This paper aims to determine the magnitude of BRT operationalization on economic growth and the unemployment rate in Jakarta. This paper used panel data consisting of 5 cities in Jakarta during 2016-2021. 2 Stage Least Square is being used as a methodology that estimates endogenous & predetermined variables. Secondary data used consist of economic growth, the unemployment rate as the endogenous and BRT kilometer traveled private vehicle units, stock capital growth, and the number of the labor force as the predetermined ones. The findings in this study indicate that the operationalization of BRT contributes 0,01577231 to economic growth and decreases 0,00120415 the employment rate in Jakarta at the significance level of 5% ceteris paribus. It suggests that in the long-run BRT, operationalization plays an important role in the transportation economic sector in Jakarta

Keywords

References (45)

  1. Anas, R., Tamin, O. Z., & Wibowo, S. S. (2015). Applying input-output model to estimate the broader economic benefits of Cipularang Tollroad Investment to Bandung District. Procedia Engineering, 125, 489–497.
  2. Ansar, A., Flyvbjerg, B., Budzier, A., & Lunn, D. (2016). Does infrastructure investment lead to economic growth or economic fragility? Evidence from China. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 32(3), 360–390.
  3. Bappenas. (2007). Rugi Akibat Macet Capai 43 Trilyun. Available at: Www.Bappenas.Go.Id. Www.Bappenas.Go.Id
  4. Bappenas. (2017). Bappenas: Kerugian akibat Macet Jakarta Rp 67 Triliun Per Tahun. 2017. Www.Bappenas.Go.Id.
  5. Baum-Snow, N., & Kahn, M. E. (2000). The effects of new public projects to expand urban rail transit. Journal of Public Economics, 77(2), 241–263.
  6. Bent, E. M., Hiatt, R., & Singa, K. (2008). Full-featured bus rapid transit in San Francisco, California: Toward a comprehensive planning approach and evaluation framework. Transportation Research Record, 2072(1), 89–100.
  7. Brandtner, C., Lunn, A., & Young, C. (2019). Spatial mismatch and youth unemployment in US cities: public transportation as a labor market institution. Socio-Economic Review, 17(2), 357–379.
  8. Currie, G. (2005). The demand performance of bus rapid transit. Journal of Public Transportation, 8(1), 41–55.
  9. Diao, M., Fan, Y., & Sing, T. F. (2017). A new mass rapid transit (MRT) line construction and housing wealth: Evidence from the circle line. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development (2017), 1, 1–64.
  10. Fan, Y., Guthrie, A., & Levinson, D. (2012). Impact of light-rail implementation on labor market accessibility: A transportation equity perspective. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 5(3), 28–39.

How to Cite

Satrio, R. B., Hidayat, A. K., & Hayati, A. . (2023). The Impact of Transjakarta Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Operationalization on Economic Growth and Unemployment Rate in DKI Jakarta Province. Quantitative Economics and Management Studies, 4(2), 261–277. https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.qems1522